Days like crazy paving

Wibbley Wobbley Timey Wimey Spacey Wacey Crickety Cricket Flippity Floppity

4 notes

I’d think stating a character that looks human, is found relatable by many people, and that has been shown to fall in love (at least something we recognize as such by human standards) to be asexual is a much better attempt at representation than /no/ attempt

I’d think stating a character that looks human, is found relatable by many people, and that has been shown to fall in love (at least something we recognize as such by human standards) to be asexual is a much better attempt at representation than /no/ attempt

Filed under stovepipehat

6 notes

if we’re just talking about why people like the concept of looming there’s like 389567 things I could list starting with representation

if we’re just talking about why people like the concept of looming there’s like 389567 things I could list starting with representation

Filed under looms are cool

5 notes

ohhhhhh alright
There’s a few different reasons
it’s not a very well liked concept for a lot of fans so the joke is that we really like it, a bit like adric. It’s just seeing the irony in ‘hey this is actually very interesting’ when it’s usually brushed off or disliked.
it’s an unusual, pretty alien idea so the joke comes from taking it casually
it freaks nuvians out

ohhhhhh alright

There’s a few different reasons

  • it’s not a very well liked concept for a lot of fans so the joke is that we really like it, a bit like adric. It’s just seeing the irony in ‘hey this is actually very interesting’ when it’s usually brushed off or disliked.
  • it’s an unusual, pretty alien idea so the joke comes from taking it casually
  • it freaks nuvians out

Filed under tardis scooter theres a few other things but humor wise that's sort of how i can explain it? i'd ask patrexes for further details she was loomed

8 notes

Anonymous asked: Hi, you look like a respectable and intelligent whovian so um... can you breifly explain the looms thing? the entire classic who fandom mentions it and I've been to embarrased to ask why.

It’s a concept from the books; basically, gallifreyans are infertile so they use a sort of machine called a ‘loom’ to create other gallifreyans.

Filed under well that's the simple version anyways (it's alright) (it's pretty obscure)

16 notes

cuddlesomefrank asked: Help! I've been trapped in the doctor who fandom! At first it was just the new series, then the classics. Abd it was fine, until I feel into the big finish rabbit hole. I haven't even started in books and comics. Is there any escape?!

no im sorry there’s no hope left. just try not to struggle and maybe you won’t sink as quick

3 notes

Anonymous asked: Are you asexual? Sorry if it's too personal a question. Feel free to ignore me.

No, no that’s not too personal, don’t worry

Um, I’m not sure. I’ve been a bit confused about it for a while and I’m still trying to figure it all out.

6 notes

Anonymous asked: Hello I saw some of your posts about asexuality and I have never been interested in sex it just isn't something that ever crosses my mind but when I tell people that I think I'm asexual they ask how do I know if I've never had sex. Are they right or is it just because they don't understand? I like your blog by the way and your non bias love of the Doctor's :)

No, they just don’t understand. You can know your orientation full well without having to try anything else out. 

Asexuality doesn’t actually refer to a lack of sex, it refers to a lack of sexual attraction, so it isn’t determined by any sex you may or may not have. so just call yourself whatever makes you most comfortable, and don’t listen to people who say things like that.

Here’s a list of other whovians on here (many of whom are asexual) who could help:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AslGsiX1O0ztdHJnOHNkMkw1Y2o1RHlXcU05am9MVkE&usp=drive_web#gid=0

Here’s the main website for asexuality, it will probably help too:

http://www.asexuality.org/home/

You can always come and talk to me if you have questions and I’ll try my best to help :)

102 notes

I wish people would stop using polls that display a heavy bias toward david tennant as ‘proof’ that he’s the best doctor and then writing articles with little depth as to why beyond ‘he brought the show back to popularity’ or ‘rose was a good companion’ while throwing paul and colin at the bottom because ‘he didn’t have much screen time’ or ‘his clothes were ugly’

Filed under urgh doctor who tenth doctor he's good but? please actually examine the reasons why classic who

279 notes

xxxtenxrose4everxxx:

hon let me sum this up for you
its not just the shit effects its the rubbish storys that are boring and take 50 episodes to finish characters that put you to sleep as well as not much action going on and a crap sound track to.
to sum it up
the third three doctors where boring as hell and never did alot through i only saw a couple of them
tom barker is alright and kind of funny but the show was still dull sadly
peter davson was cute and i liked him but again the episodes where boring and went on forever
and then you had colin who was utter rubbish and ruined the show and maccoy or whatever looked like a fat verson of the ridler from batmans.
the shows just old and sad now and fans need to let it go now(like the frozen song lol)

tom barker

xxxtenxrose4everxxx:

hon let me sum this up for you

its not just the shit effects its the rubbish storys that are boring and take 50 episodes to finish characters that put you to sleep as well as not much action going on and a crap sound track to.

to sum it up

the third three doctors where boring as hell and never did alot through i only saw a couple of them

tom barker is alright and kind of funny but the show was still dull sadly

peter davson was cute and i liked him but again the episodes where boring and went on forever

and then you had colin who was utter rubbish and ruined the show and maccoy or whatever looked like a fat verson of the ridler from batmans.

the shows just old and sad now and fans need to let it go now(like the frozen song lol)

tom barker

(Source: classicwhovianproblems)

Filed under ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????